Using AI For HR Document Routing

City of North Miami HR Workflow | Case Study | AI Made This
Case Study
Proof of Concept

City of North MiamiHR Document Routing

“We’re chasing paperwork around the building and updating a spreadsheet when we find it.” — Workshop participant, HR Department

Category Municipal Government
Department Human Resources
Timeline Built in Session
Engagement Snapshot
Tool type PAR Routing Tracker
Previous system Manual Excel Sheet
Routing stages built 7 Stages
Departments touched 5+ Depts.
Human approval gates At Every Stage
Delivery Live in Workshop
7
Routing Stages
Intake through archive, fully mapped
0
Excel Rows Required
Replaced entirely by live dashboard
1
Session to Build
Functional prototype delivered same day
5+
Dept. Touchpoints
HR, Finance, Legal, CM, Dept Directors
The Assignment

Before We Advise,
We Build.

The AI Made This methodology does not live in slide decks. It lives in documented, operational systems built during the actual workshop — in front of the staff who will use them.

The City of North Miami HR Department described a problem every municipal HR team knows: personnel action requests moving through five departments on paper, tracked in a shared Excel file that nobody had time to update. When an employee called to ask where their promotion paperwork was, HR was guessing.

The brief was simple: make the invisible visible. Show every PAR’s current stage, who owns it, how long it has been sitting, and where it is overdue — without adding work for the staff doing the routing.

“AI is a tool for building resilient systems, not just for increasing speed.”
— The AIMTB Operating Principle

Why This Project Matters

  • It proves the methodology works before we ask a client to trust it
  • It replaces a manual process staff actually hated doing
  • It closes the gap between “AI matters” and “here is what AI produces”
  • It becomes the floor — not the ceiling — for what automation can do next
The Problem

Paper That Disappears
Into the Building.

Personnel Action Requests are the paperwork backbone of any HR department — covering new hires, promotions, transfers, pay changes, separations, and reclassifications. Every one of them needs to route through multiple departments before it is complete.

At North Miami, that routing happened manually. On paper. Tracked in Excel. Updated only when someone remembered to update it.

📥
No intake system PARs arrived via email, in person, and by interoffice mail. There was no single point of entry and no confirmation that a document had been received.
🔍
No real-time visibility The shared Excel tracker was updated manually, inconsistently, and usually after the fact. When a status question came in, staff had to physically track the document down.
⏱️
No SLA enforcement There were no automatic alerts when a document sat too long in one department. Delays were discovered only when someone complained — weeks after the fact.
🔁
No routing logic Which department needed to review which document type was institutional knowledge. If the person who knew left, so did the process.
📁
No audit trail When something went wrong — a missed approval, an incorrect action, a document lost in transit — there was no record of who touched it, when, or what was done.
What We Built

A Living Tracker.
Not Another Spreadsheet.

Working directly from the HR team’s description of their actual routing workflow, we built a fully interactive Personnel Action Request tracking system during the workshop session — no vendor procurement, no IT ticket, no months-long implementation.

The tool maps exactly how PARs move through the organization: from the moment a department submits one to the moment it is archived. Every stage is visible. Every delay is flagged automatically. Every document has a clear owner.

📋

7-Stage Routing Pipeline

Intake → HR Review → Department Approval → Processing → Finance → Final Authorization → Archive. Each stage maps to a real owner and a defined SLA window.

📊

Live Dashboard with KPIs

Real-time counts of active PARs, documents awaiting action, overdue requests, monthly completions, and average days open. The kind of visibility that used to require a phone call.

⚠️

Automatic Overdue Flags

Any PAR open more than 7 days triggers a visual flag — no manual checking required. Supervisors can see at a glance what is stalled and who owns it.

🔍

Search + Filter by Stage

HR staff can search by name, PAR ID, or department, and filter by any routing stage. Pipeline cards at the top show document counts per stage at a glance.

👤

Detail Panel with Timeline

Click any record to see the full routing history — where it has been, where it is, and who owns each stage. One place to answer every status question.

Human Approval Gates

Every stage transition requires a deliberate staff action: Advance, Return, or Flag. No document moves without a person approving it. Accountability built in by design.

“The sessions weren’t theoretical. By day two we had working mockups of our actual workflows — permit tracking, 311 queues, PAR routing — built around our real challenges. Staff left knowing exactly what AI could do for them.”
— Pilot Participant, City of North Miami
Built in Session — Live Example
The Actual Tool.
Try It.

This is the PAR Routing Tracker built for the City of North Miami HR Department. Fully interactive — click any row, advance a stage, submit a new PAR. Not a mockup of a mockup. The real thing.

PAR Routing Tracker — HR Department · City of North Miami

Fully interactive — click any record to view routing timeline, advance stages, or submit a new PAR. Built live during the 2-day workshop pilot.

Human Resources · City of North Miami
What This Proves

The Tool Is the Argument.

Government AI adoption stalls at the credibility gap. Leadership is interested. Staff is skeptical. Vendors promise transformation. Nobody shows up with something that works on Tuesday.

The PAR Tracker exists to close that gap. It was not built as a pitch. It was built as a proof — that real workflows can be mapped, digitized, and made visible without a six-month procurement cycle and a seven-figure budget.

“The most sophisticated workflow tools fail without organizational mandates and staff buy-in. But you cannot get buy-in for something nobody can see. This is what makes the mockup-first approach work: people react to what they can touch.”
— AIMTB Methodology Note
Next Steps
🔗
Connect to a real HRIS or SharePoint backend The tracker logic maps directly to Power Automate or NEOGOV eForms. The prototype becomes the specification document.
📧
Add automated email notifications Stage transitions trigger emails to assignees. Overdue flags trigger supervisor alerts. No manual follow-up required.
📱
Mobile-responsive for field departments Public Works and Utilities supervisors need to approve from the field. Responsive layout is the next design iteration.
Adoption Strategy
🏛️
City Manager mandate required Technology solves the visibility problem. Leadership solves the participation problem. Both are required for adoption.
👩‍💼
Department liaisons as owners Each department needs one named person responsible for updating PAR status on their end. Accountability cannot be automated.
📊
Monthly SLA reporting to leadership The dashboard becomes a management tool when it shows cycle time trends to directors. Data drives behavior change.

Ready to See Your Workflows
Built in Real Time?

We bring the 2-day workshop to your agency. Day 1 we map the bottlenecks. Day 2 we build the tools. You leave with working prototypes, not slide decks.

Schedule a Discovery Call →

Also available as a train-the-trainer model for corporate training partners and associations.

AI Made This  |  AI Training & Implementation for Government & Enterprise  |  aimadethisbrand.com